Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department modified an order dismissing claims against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey arising from a suicide from the George Washington Bridge. The court held that allegations concerning the Port Authority's failure to maintain the bridge's pedestrian walkway and install suicide barriers implicated a proprietary duty to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition. The complaint was reinstated to the extent it alleged breach of that duty and otherwise affirmed.
Holdings
- The Port Authority's responsibility for maintaining the guardrail on the George Washington Bridge's pedestrian walkway is a proprietary function rather than a governmental function.
- The complaint stated a cause of action to the extent it alleged that the Port Authority, as property owner, negligently failed to maintain the George Washington Bridge in a reasonably safe condition by failing to install suicide barriers along the walkways.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Port Authority's responsibility for maintaining the George Washington Bridge's pedestrian walkway and guardrail was a proprietary rather than governmental function.
- Whether the complaint stated a cause of action by alleging that the Port Authority negligently failed to maintain the bridge in a reasonably safe condition by failing to install suicide barriers.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Feldman v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 194 A.D.3d 137 (1st Dep't 2021)(followed)
- Perlov v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 189 A.D.3d 1624 (2d Dep't 2020)(followed)
- Wittorf v. City of New York, 23 N.Y.3d 473 (2014)(applied)
- Sebastian v. State of New York, 93 N.Y.2d 790 (1999)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.