Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department reversed the denial of the defendant's motion for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall action. The court held that the storm in progress doctrine applied and that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue that the defendant's snow-removal activities created or exacerbated the hazardous condition.
Holdings
- A landowner's duty to take reasonable measures to remedy a dangerous condition caused by a storm is suspended while the storm is ongoing and until a reasonable time after it ends; defendant established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by showing that a winter storm was in progress when plaintiff fell.
- After defendant showed that the storm-in-progress doctrine applied, plaintiff could defeat summary judgment only by raising a triable issue of fact that defendant's snow-removal activities created or exacerbated the hazardous condition; plaintiff failed to do so.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendant established entitlement to summary judgment under New York's storm-in-progress doctrine.
- Whether plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact that defendant's snow-removal activities created or exacerbated the dangerous condition.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (4)
- Weinberger v 52 Duane Assoc. LLC, 102 A.D.3d 618, 619 (1st Dep't 2013)(followed)
- Pippo v City of New York, 43 A.D.3d 303, 304 (1st Dep't 2007)(followed)
- Baumann v Dawn Liqs., Inc., 148 A.D.3d 535, 537 (1st Dep't 2017)(followed)
- Pipero v New York City Tr. Auth., 69 A.D.3d 493 (1st Dep't 2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…