Summary
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, affirmed orders denying summary judgment motions in a medical malpractice action arising from catastrophic brain injury following cardiac arrest. The court held that plaintiff’s expert affidavits raised a triable issue regarding the alleged failure to provide hypothermic therapy and that factual issues remained as to whether the hospital could be vicariously liable for the conduct of an independent-contractor physician treating an unconscious emergency-room patient.
Holdings
- Summary judgment was properly denied because, although Occhino met his initial burden by submitting detailed factual evidence that he complied with the accepted standard of care, plaintiff's experts raised a triable issue of fact concerning whether Lewis was an appropriate candidate for hypothermic therapy and had reached the necessary hemodynamic stability.
- The Mercy defendants were not entitled to summary judgment because they failed to establish that Lewis presented to the emergency room seeking treatment from Occhino specifically rather than from Mercy Hospital generally; triable issues therefore remained regarding hospital vicarious liability for an independent contractor's alleged malpractice.
Questions Presented
- Whether Occhino established entitlement to summary judgment by showing that he did not depart from the applicable medical standard of care or that any departure did not proximately cause the injury.
- Whether plaintiff's expert affidavits raised a triable issue of fact concerning whether Lewis was an appropriate candidate for hypothermic therapy and had reached the required hemodynamic stability.
- Whether Mercy Hospital and Catholic Health System established entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the claim that they were vicariously liable for malpractice by an independent-contractor physician.
- Whether the plaintiff's general knowledge of hospital-physician relationships established actual knowledge that Occhino was not Mercy Hospital's agent.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (18)
- Occhino v Fan, 151 AD3d 1870, 1871 [4th Dept 2017](followed)
- Isensee v Upstate Orthopedics, LLP, 174 AD3d 1520, 1521 [4th Dept 2019](followed)
- Bubar v Brodman, 177 AD3d 1358, 1359 [4th Dept 2019](followed)
- Bristol v Bunn, 189 AD3d 2114, 2116 [4th Dept 2020](followed)
- Pasek v Catholic Health Sys., Inc., 186 AD3d 1035, 1036 [4th Dept 2020](followed)
- Groff v Kaleida Health, 161 AD3d 1518, 1520 [4th Dept 2018](followed)
- Larsen v Banwar, 70 AD3d 1337, 1338 [4th Dept 2010](followed)
- Clark v Rachfal, 207 AD3d 1173, 1175 [4th Dept 2022](followed)
- Mason v Adhikary, 159 AD3d 1438, 1439 [4th Dept 2018](followed)
- Diaz v New York Downtown Hosp., 99 NY2d 542, 544 [2002](followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…