Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reviewed orders concerning modification of child visitation, custody, alleged violation of a visitation order, forensic evaluation, and therapeutic supervision. The court affirmed the orders in substance but held that the Family Court improperly delegated future visitation decisions to a therapist, modified one order accordingly, and remitted the matter for further proceedings on visitation.
Holdings
- The father failed to establish a change in circumstances warranting transfer of custody from the mother to him.
- The father failed to establish that the mother violated the prior visitation order.
- The evidence established a change in circumstances sufficient to modify visitation and require that the father's visitation be supervised by a therapist.
- The Family Court properly appointed a neutral expert to conduct forensic evaluations and properly qualified the forensic evaluator as an expert.
- Any error introduced by the forensic evaluator's report or testimony was harmless and did not require reversal.
- The Family Court improperly delegated authority to determine future visitation issues to the therapist.
Questions Presented
- Whether the father established a change in circumstances and the child's best interests sufficient to transfer custody from the mother to him.
- Whether the mother violated the prior visitation order by failing to provide the father's visitation.
- Whether the evidence established a sufficient change in circumstances to modify the visitation order and require therapist-supervised visitation.
- Whether the Family Court properly appointed and qualified a forensic evaluator and whether any inaccuracies in the evaluator's report or testimony required reversal.
- Whether the Family Court improperly delegated its authority over future visitation issues to a therapist.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (13)
- Matter of Abranko v. Vargas, 26 A.D.3d 490, 491 (2006)(followed)
- Matter of Morash v. Minucci, 299 A.D.2d 486, 486-487 (2002)(followed)
- Cashel v. Cashel, 46 A.D.3d 501 (2007)(followed)
- Matter of Cornell v. Cornell, 8 A.D.3d 718, 719 (2004)(followed)
- Matter of Eric L. v. Dorothy L., 130 A.D.2d 660, 661 (1987)(followed)
- Neuman v. Neuman, 19 A.D.3d 383, 384 (2005)(followed)
- Matter of Perez v. Sepulveda, 54 A.D.3d 347 (2008)(followed)
- Ekstra v. Ekstra, 49 A.D.3d 594, 595 (2008)(followed)
- Matter of Tercjak v. Tercjak, 49 A.D.3d 772, 773 (2008)(followed)
- Matter of Vanjak v. Pesa, 26 A.D.3d 512 (2006)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…