Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed a judgment awarding the plaintiff damages and attorney’s fees for an alleged violation of New York’s Franchise Sales Act. The court held that the defendants raised a triable issue regarding the isolated-sales exemption and that the plaintiff failed to establish damages or a willful and material violation supporting attorney’s fees.
Holdings
- The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal from those orders terminated upon entry of the final judgment; issues raised in those appeals are reviewable on the appeal from the judgment.
- Although the plaintiff made a prima facie showing that the licensing agreement was a franchise and that no offering prospectus had been registered, the defendants raised a triable issue of fact concerning whether the agreement qualified for the isolated-sales exemption under General Business Law § 684(3)(c).
- The plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment because it failed to submit evidentiary proof that it sustained damages as a result of the alleged Franchise Sales Act violation or that the violation was willful and material, as required for an attorney's-fee award.
Questions Presented
- Whether the licensing agreement constituted a franchise agreement under General Business Law § 681(3).
- Whether the defendants raised a triable issue of fact regarding the isolated-sales exemption from the Franchise Sales Act's registration requirement under General Business Law § 684(3)(c).
- Whether the plaintiff established damages caused by the alleged Franchise Sales Act violation.
- Whether the plaintiff established that the alleged violation was willful and material so as to support an attorney's-fee award under General Business Law § 691(1).
- Whether the appeals from the intermediate orders remained appealable after entry of the final judgment.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (3)
- Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248 (1976)(followed)
- Jung Hing Leung v. Lotus Ride, 198 A.D.2d 155, 156-157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)(followed)
- Baker Boy of Glendale v. 35-63 82nd St. Corp., 166 A.D.2d 397, 398-399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…