Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order denying the plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment on liability and granting the defendants' cross motion to vacate their default and serve a late answer. The court held that the defendants failed to establish both a reasonable excuse for their default and a potentially meritorious defense.
Holdings
- Plaintiffs established their entitlement to judgment on liability by submitting proof of service, proof of the facts constituting their claim, and proof of defendants' failure to appear or answer.
- Defendants were required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for their default and the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and they failed to make either showing sufficient to defeat plaintiffs' motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs established entitlement to a default judgment on liability under CPLR 3215.
- Whether defendants demonstrated both a reasonable excuse for their default and a potentially meritorious defense sufficient to vacate the default and obtain leave to serve a late answer.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (11)
- Wassertheil v. Elburg, LLC, 94 A.D.3d 753, 753 (2012)(followed)
- C&H Import & Export, Inc. v. MNA Global, Inc., 79 A.D.3d 784, 785 (2010)(followed)
- Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141 (1986)(followed)
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Izmirligil, 88 A.D.3d 930, 931 (2011)(followed)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cervini, 84 A.D.3d 789, 789 (2011)(followed)
- Kouzios v. Dery, 57 A.D.3d 949, 950 (2008)(followed)
- Antoine v. Bee, 26 A.D.3d 306, 306 (2006)(followed)
- Majestic Clothing Inc. v. East Coast Stor., LLC, 18 A.D.3d 516, 518 (2005)(followed)
- Ogman v. Mastrantonio Catering, Inc., 82 A.D.3d 852, 853 (2011)(followed)
- Gross v. Kail, 70 A.D.3d 997, 998 (2010)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…