Summary
The Appellate Division affirmed an order modifying a prior custody arrangement to award the father sole legal and physical custody. The court held that the Family Court properly found a sufficient change in circumstances and that the modification was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record.
Holdings
- The Family Court properly found a sufficient change in circumstances requiring modification of custody to protect the child's best interests, and its award of sole legal and physical custody to the father was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record.
- The father's contention that the mother's visitation should be modified was not properly before the Appellate Division because the father did not appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Family Court properly modified the existing custody arrangement based on a sufficient change in circumstances and the child's best interests.
- Whether the mother's challenge to the custody determination should be rejected because the Family Court's findings had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
- Whether the father's request to modify the mother's visitation was properly before the Appellate Division when the father had not appealed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Matter of Tori v Tori, 103 A.D.3d 654, 655 (2013)(cited)
- Matter of Ross v Ross, 96 A.D.3d 856, 857 (2012)(cited)
- Matter of Pignataro v Davis, 8 A.D.3d 487, 488 (2004)(cited)
- Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171-172 (1982)(cited)
- Matter of O'Loughlin v Sweetland, 98 A.D.3d 983, 984 (2012)(cited)
- Matter of Jackson v Coleman, 94 A.D.3d 762, 763 (2012)(cited)
- Matter of Buxenbaum v Fulmer, 82 A.D.3d 1223, 1224 (2011)(cited)
- Matter of Flores v Mark, 107 A.D.3d 796, 797 (2013), leave denied, 21 N.Y.3d 865 (2013)(cited)
- Matter of Lawlor v Eder, 106 A.D.3d 739, 740 (2013)(cited)
- Matter of Pappas v Kells, 77 A.D.3d 952, 953-954 (2010)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…