Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order denying the defendants’ motion to change venue from Kings County to New York County in a medical malpractice and lack-of-informed-consent action. The court held that the defendants failed to establish prima facie that the plaintiff was not a Kings County resident when the action was commenced, so the burden did not shift to the plaintiff.
Holdings
- Defendants failed to demonstrate prima facie that the plaintiff was not a resident of Kings County when she commenced the action; therefore, the burden did not shift to the plaintiff to establish her Kings County residence, and the motion to change venue was properly denied.
- For venue purposes, a residence is a place where a party stays for some time with a bona fide intent to retain it as a residence for some length of time and with some degree of permanency, and a party may have more than one residence.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants established prima facie that the plaintiff was not a resident of Kings County when the action was commenced, warranting a change of venue to New York County under CPLR 503(a).
- Whether a party may have more than one residence for purposes of venue.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Ellis v. Wirshba, 18 AD3d 805, 805(followed)
- Patton v. Malychev, 132 AD3d 829, 830(followed)
- Forbes v. Rubinovich, 94 AD3d 809, 810(applied and contrasted)
- Farrington v. Fordham Assoc., LLC, 129 AD3d 591, 592(followed)
- Chehab v. Roitman, 120 AD3d 736, 737-738(followed)
- Deas v. Ahmed, 120 AD3d 750, 751(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…