Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order invalidating James Coll’s designating petition for Nassau County Legislator, 15th Legislative District. The court held that the description “15th District Nassau County Legislature” was sufficiently informative under Election Law § 6-132 and denied a related motion to dismiss the appeal on laches and mootness grounds.
Holdings
- The description "15th District Nassau County Legislature" was sufficiently informative under Election Law § 6-132(1) because, when the petition was read as a whole, it precluded any reasonable probability of confusing or deceiving the signers, voters, or board of elections.
- The motion to dismiss the appeal was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether the description "15th District Nassau County Legislature" sufficiently stated the public office sought under Election Law § 6-132(1).
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on laches or because meaningful relief could no longer be granted under the Election Law.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (14)
- Matter of Notholt v Nassau County Bd. of Elections, 131 A.D.3d 641, 642-643(followed)
- Matter of Dunlea v New York State Bd. of Elections, 275 A.D.2d 589, 590(followed)
- Matter of Smith v Mahoney, 60 N.Y.2d 596, 597(followed)
- Matter of Packer v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 207 A.D.2d 513, 514(followed)
- Matter of Ighile v Board of Elections in City of N.Y., 66 A.D.3d 899, 900(followed)
- Matter of Liepshutz v Palmateer, 112 A.D.2d 1101, 1101-1102(followed)
- Matter of Donnelly v McNab, 83 A.D.2d 896(followed)
- Matter of Hicks v Walsh, 76 A.D.3d 773(followed)
- Matter of Bragman v Larsen, 2017 NY Slip Op 06267 (2d Dep't 2017)(contrasted)
- Matter of Sears v Kimmel, 76 A.D.3d 1113(contrasted)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…