Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order granting CitiMortgage summary judgment and an order of reference in a mortgage foreclosure action. The court held that CitiMortgage failed to establish prima facie compliance with the ninety-day notice requirements of RPAPL 1304 because its evidence did not establish that the notices were sent by first-class mail.
Holdings
- Citimortgage failed to establish prima facie that it complied with RPAPL 1304 because its documentary evidence did not establish that the required notices were mailed by first-class mail.
Questions Presented
- Whether Citimortgage established prima facie compliance with RPAPL 1304's pre-foreclosure notice and mailing requirements.
- Whether summary judgment and an order of reference could be granted when the plaintiff failed to establish satisfaction of a statutory condition precedent to commencing the foreclosure action.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (7)
- Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Weisblum, 85 AD3d 95, 106(followed)
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Spanos, 102 AD3d 909, 910(followed)
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Wallach, 163 AD3d 520, 521(followed)
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Espinal, 134 AD3d 876, 878(followed)
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Banks, 155 AD3d 936, 937(applied by comparison)
- Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853(followed)
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Zavolunov, 157 AD3d 754, 757(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…