Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Nelson

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Nelson, 2020 NY Slip Op 02604 (App. Div. 2020) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · May 6, 2020 · No. 2018-10193; 2020-02615

Summary

The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed orders granting Deutsche Bank National Trust Company summary judgment, striking the defendants’ answer, and appointing a referee in a mortgage foreclosure action. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie compliance with RPAPL 1304 and the mortgage’s notice-of-default requirements.

Holdings

  1. The plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that it strictly complied with RPAPL 1304 because its affidavit did not demonstrate the affiant's knowledge of the sender's mailing practices and was not supported by independent evidence of actual mailing or a properly established standard office mailing procedure.
  2. The plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that the notice of default was mailed by first-class mail in accordance with sections 15 and 22 of the mortgage agreement.
  3. The Supreme Court should have denied the branches of the plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment against the defendants, striking their answer, and an order of reference.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff established prima facie strict compliance with RPAPL 1304's 90-day notice requirement.
  2. Whether the plaintiff established prima facie that the contractually required notice of default was mailed by first-class mail as required by the mortgage agreement.
  3. Whether the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment, striking of the defendants' answer, and an order of reference.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (7)

  • Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Ettinger, 176 AD3d 1152, 1154(followed)
  • LNV Corp. v. Sofer, 171 AD3d 1033, 1037(followed)
  • U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cope, 175 AD3d 527, 529(followed)
  • Citibank, N.A. v. Conti-Scheurer, 172 AD3d 17, 21(followed)
  • U.S. Bank N.A. v. Kochhar, 176 AD3d 1010, 1012(followed)
  • U.S. Bank N.A. v. Ahmed, 174 AD3d 661, 663(followed)
  • Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kljajic, 168 AD3d 659, 661(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…