Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the denial of a property owner's motion for summary judgment in a premises-liability action. The court held that the absence of a code violation did not resolve common-law negligence issues and that the defendant failed to establish lack of constructive notice of an unguarded fire-escape stairway opening.
Holdings
- The absence of a violation of a specific code or ordinance is not dispositive of common-law negligence claims; a landowner may be negligent for departing from generally accepted customs and practices even when the condition complies with relevant codes and ordinances.
- A defendant is not entitled to summary judgment where it fails to establish prima facie that it lacked constructive notice of a dangerous condition that was visible, apparent, and present for a sufficient period to permit discovery and remediation.
- An open-and-obvious condition and allegations that the plaintiff was negligent bear on comparative negligence but do not, by themselves, absolve the defendant of liability.
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendant established entitlement to summary judgment by showing that the unguarded stairway opening was not a dangerous or defective condition because it complied with applicable codes and statutes.
- Whether the defendant established prima facie that it lacked constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition.
- Whether the allegedly open and obvious danger or the plaintiff's conduct in standing with his back to the opening absolved the defendant of liability at the summary-judgment stage.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (12)
- Kellman v 45 Tiemann Assoc., 87 NY2d 871, 872(followed)
- Locke v Calamit, 175 AD3d 560, 561(followed)
- Steed v MVA Enters., LLC, 136 AD3d 793, 794(followed)
- Beri v Chung Fat Supermarket, Inc., 125 AD3d 587, 587(followed)
- Romero v Waterfront N.Y., 168 AD3d 1012, 1013(followed)
- Alexis v Motel Oasis, 143 AD3d 926, 927(followed)
- DeCarlo v Vacchio, 147 AD3d 724, 724-725(followed)
- Swerdlow v WSK Props. Corp., 5 AD3d 587, 588(followed)
- Fortune v Western Beef, Inc., 178 AD3d 671, 672(followed)
- Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837-838(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…