Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed a Family Court determination that a child was neglected under Family Court Act article 10. The court held that postpetition evidence should not have been considered at fact-finding, but concluded that the prepetition evidence concerning the respondent’s cognitive limitations, memory problems, unstable housing, and inability to manage medications and finances was sufficient to establish neglect by a preponderance of the evidence.
Holdings
- Postpetition evidence concerning respondent's parenting abilities should not have been considered at the fact-finding hearing because it was admitted to prove factual matters rather than solely for impeachment, and the petition had not been conformed to the proof or supplemented with additional petitions.
- The prepetition evidence was sufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the child was neglected because respondent's cognitive and memory impairments, combined with her circumstances and conduct, demonstrated an actual failure to exercise the minimum degree of care and placed the child in imminent danger of impairment.
Questions Presented
- Whether Family Court improperly considered postpetition evidence during the fact-finding hearing.
- Whether the remaining prepetition evidence was sufficient to establish that the child was neglected under Family Court Act § 1012(f)(i)(B).
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Matter of Ashley X., 50 A.D.3d 1194, 1196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)(followed)
- Matter of Jewle I., 44 A.D.3d 1105, 1107 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)(followed)
- Matter of Jessica YY., 258 A.D.2d 743, 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)(followed)
- Matter of Sara X., 122 A.D.2d 795, 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986), appeal dismissed, 69 N.Y.2d 707 (1986)(followed)
- Matter of Darlene T., 28 N.Y.2d 391, 396 (1971)(distinguished)
- Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 369-370 (2004)(followed)
- Matter of Katie R., 251 A.D.2d 698, 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998), leave to appeal denied, 92 N.Y.2d 809 (1998)(followed)
- Matter of Markus MM., 17 A.D.3d 747, 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)(followed)
- Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Denise J., 87 N.Y.2d 73, 79 (1995)(followed)
- Matter of Mary Kate VV., 59 A.D.3d 873, 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009), leave to appeal denied, 12 N.Y.3d 711 (2009)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…