Summary
The Appellate Division dismissed a father's appeal from a Family Court order adjudicating his children neglected under Family Court Act article 10 because the order was entered on consent and he had not moved to vacate it. The court additionally stated that, if the order were reviewable, the record showed that the father knowingly and voluntarily consented after being informed of the order's implications.
Holdings
- An order entered on consent cannot be appealed.
- When a respondent challenges the voluntariness or validity of a consent order but has not moved to vacate the order on those grounds, the appeal must be dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether an appeal may be taken from a Family Court order entered on the respondent's consent.
- Whether the appellate court could review the respondent's claim that his consent was involuntary when he had not moved to vacate the consent order.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Matter of Gabrielle S. [Reberick T.], 105 AD3d 1098, 1098-1099 (2013)(followed)
- Matter of Trenton G. [Lianne H.], 100 AD3d 1124, 1125 (2012)(followed)
- Matter of Fantasia Y., 45 AD3d 1215, 1216 (2007)(followed)
- Matter of Mary UU. [Michael UU.–Marie VV.], 70 AD3d 1227, 1228 (2010)(followed)
- Matter of Nicole KK., 46 AD3d 1267, 1268 (2007)(followed)
- Matter of Cheyenne QQ., 37 AD3d 977, 978 (2007)(followed)
- Matter of Gabriella R. [Mindyn S.], 68 AD3d 1487, 1488 (2009), lv dismissed 14 NY3d 812 (2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…