Summary
The court awarded a seaman maintenance and cure for the period after he was marked fit for duty, concluding that his disabling back condition continued and that further medical improvement remained possible. It awarded $9,012 based on 1,239 days of maintenance at $8 per day, less wages earned, without interest before judgment.
Holdings
- A seaman's fit-for-duty designation does not bar maintenance and cure if the seaman in fact remains in pain, has not achieved maximum medical recovery, and further improvement remains medically possible.
- The plaintiff was entitled to maintenance through February 5, 1959, the date he was discharged from Bellevue as an outpatient receiving post-operative care.
- The plaintiff could not recover additional medical treatment expenses as part of the reserved maintenance-and-cure award because the evidence and jury instructions on those expenses had already been presented in the negligence and unseaworthiness claims and recovery was presumably included in the jury's verdict.
- The plaintiff was entitled to maintenance at $8 per day under the collective bargaining agreement, for 1,239 compensable days, reduced by approximately $900 in wages earned, resulting in an award of $9,012.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff was entitled to maintenance and cure after being marked fit for duty by Marine hospitals.
- Whether the maintenance-and-cure obligation continued through the plaintiff's eventual surgery and post-operative recovery.
- Whether the plaintiff could recover separately for medical treatment expenses incurred after his discharge from Marine hospital care.
- What maintenance amount was recoverable, including deductions for periods of inpatient hospitalization and wages earned.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Koslusky v. United States, 208 F.2d 957, 959 (2d Cir. 1953)(followed)
- Livanos v. National Bulk Carriers, 248 F.2d 815, 817 (2d Cir. 1957)(followed)
- Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc., 279 F.2d 911 (2d Cir. 1960)(applied)
- McCarthy v. American Eastern Corp., 175 F.2d 727, 729 (3d Cir. 1949)(applied)
- Perez v. Suwanee S. S. Co., 239 F.2d 180, 181 (2d Cir. 1956)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…