Edwards v. Strata Solar, LLC

No. COA 25-605 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · December 17, 2025 · No. COA 25-605

Summary

The North Carolina Court of Appeals reviews the dismissal of Rebecca Edwards’s wrongful-discharge claims against Strata Solar, LLC. The court affirms dismissal of claims based specifically on pregnancy and disability discrimination, concluding that the complaint did not identify an applicable North Carolina public policy or qualifying disability. The court reverses dismissal of the sex-discrimination claim, holding that the allegations plausibly supported an inference of discriminatory motive, and remands for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. North Carolina's Equal Employment Practices Act does not expressly identify pregnancy as a protected classification and does not establish a public policy prohibiting adverse employment action based specifically on pregnancy, miscarriage, or pregnancy-related medical leave. The pregnancy-based portion of plaintiff's wrongful-discharge claim was properly dismissed.
  2. Plaintiff failed to state a wrongful-discharge claim based on disability discrimination because she did not allege facts demonstrating a qualifying disability at the time of termination or that defendant knew of an ongoing qualifying disability when it made the termination decision.
  3. Plaintiff adequately stated a wrongful-discharge claim based on sex discrimination under N.C.G.S. § 143-422.2. Allegations concerning pregnancy, miscarriage, and related medical treatment may support an inference of sex discrimination even though pregnancy itself is not a separately protected classification, and dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) was premature.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether North Carolina recognizes a wrongful-discharge public-policy claim based specifically on pregnancy, miscarriage, or pregnancy-related medical leave.
  2. Whether plaintiff adequately pleaded a qualifying disability and employer awareness of that disability to support a wrongful-discharge claim based on disability discrimination.
  3. Whether plaintiff adequately pleaded a wrongful-discharge claim based on sex discrimination under the public policy expressed in N.C.G.S. § 143-422.2, even though the complaint also described the discrimination as based on pregnancy.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (14)

  • Bridges v. Parrish, 366 N.C. 539, 541 (2013)(followed)
  • Bill Clark Homes v. Town of Fuquay-Varina, 281 N.C. App. 1, 4 (2021)(followed)
  • Gouch v. Rotunno, 291 N.C. App. 7, 10 (2023)(followed)
  • Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Indus., Inc., 347 N.C. 329, 331 (1997)(followed)
  • Coman v. Thomas Mfg. Co., Inc., 325 N.C. 172, 175 (1989)(followed)
  • Brackett v. SGL Carbon Corp., 158 N.C. App. 252, 259 (2003)(followed)
  • Whitings v. Wolfson Casing Corp., 173 N.C. App. 218, 222 (2005)(followed)
  • Jarman v. Deason, 173 N.C. App. 297, 300 (2005)(followed)
  • N.C. Dep’t of Corr. v. Gibson, 308 N.C. 131, 136 (1983)(followed)
  • Gen. Elec. Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125, 134-35, 146 (1976)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…