Summary
The Supreme Court of North Dakota affirmed a judgment upholding Workforce Safety & Insurance's order awarding Paul Genter partial disability benefits and requiring part-time work. The court held that WSI adequately considered Genter's preexisting hearing loss when developing his vocational rehabilitation plan and reasonably exercised its discretion not to establish a medical assessment team under N.D.C.C. § 65-05.1-02(6). A dissent argued that the statute required WSI to establish such a team before formulating the plan.
Holdings
- WSI adequately considered Genter's preexisting hearing loss and other functional limitations when selecting social services assistant and security guard as employment options.
- N.D.C.C. § 65-05.1-02(6) does not automatically require WSI to establish a medical assessment team whenever a worker claims an injury or preexisting condition. WSI may determine, based on the nature of the injury, whether a team is required; if one is required, WSI may determine its composition on a case-by-case basis.
- Substantial evidence supported WSI's determination that the vocational rehabilitation plan complied with Chapter 65-05.1 and gave Genter a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment.
Questions Presented
- Whether WSI adequately considered Genter's preexisting hearing loss and other functional limitations in developing his vocational rehabilitation plan.
- Whether N.D.C.C. § 65-05.1-02(6) required WSI to establish a medical assessment team to evaluate Genter's hearing loss before approving the plan.
- Whether substantial evidence supported WSI's determination that the proposed employment options provided Genter a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Toso v. Workforce Safety & Ins., 2006 ND 70, ¶ 7, 712 N.W.2d 312(followed)
- Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & Ins., 2006 ND 99, ¶ 8, 713 N.W.2d 525(followed)
- Paul v. Workforce Safety & Ins., 2003 ND 188, ¶ 11, 671 N.W.2d 795(followed)
- Stein v. Workforce Safety & Ins., 2006 ND 34, ¶ 6, 710 N.W.2d 364(followed)
- Paul v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau, 2002 ND 96, ¶ 8, 644 N.W.2d 884(followed)
- Svedberg v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau, 1999 ND 181, ¶¶ 14, 17, 599 N.W.2d 323(followed)
- Hoffman v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau, 2002 ND 138, ¶ 15, 651 N.W.2d 601(followed)
- Thompson v. N.D. Workers' Comp. Bureau, 490 N.W.2d 248, 253 (N.D. 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…