Summary
The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed an order suppressing cocaine found in Kevin James Gefroh’s pocket during a traffic stop. The court held that the automobile exception supported a warrantless search of the vehicle after a drug-sniffing dog alerted, but did not justify the warrantless search of Gefroh’s person.
Holdings
- The automobile exception to the warrant requirement permits a warrantless search of a vehicle when probable cause exists that the vehicle contains contraband, but it does not authorize a warrantless search of a person's body or clothing merely because the person was present in or driving the vehicle when probable cause arose.
- The State abandoned and did not preserve for appellate review the issue whether the search of Gefroh's pocket exceeded the permissible scope of a pat-down search.
Questions Presented
- Whether the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement permitted officers who had probable cause to search Gefroh's vehicle to conduct a warrantless search of Gefroh's person and pockets.
- Whether the State preserved for appellate review its challenge to the district court's ruling that the pocket search exceeded the permissible scope of a weapons pat-down.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- State v. Beane, 2009 ND 146, 770 N.W.2d 283(followed)
- State v. Harlan, 2008 ND 220, 758 N.W.2d 706(followed)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)(followed)
- State v. Duchene, 2007 ND 31, 727 N.W.2d 769(followed)
- State v. Johnson, 2011 ND 48, 795 N.W.2d 367(followed)
- State v. Dudley, 2010 ND 39, 779 N.W.2d 369(followed)
- State v. Gregg, 2000 ND 154, 615 N.W.2d 515(followed)
- State v. Zwicke, 2009 ND 129, 767 N.W.2d 869(followed)
- State v. Ressler, 2005 ND 140, 701 N.W.2d 915(followed)
- United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…