Summary
The North Dakota Supreme Court reversed and vacated an order requiring Julie Ann Kopperud to reimburse the State $1,317.70 in jury expenses after she failed to appear for a scheduled jury trial. The court held that N.D.R.Crim.P. 23.1 plainly prohibits assessing jury expenses in a criminal case. The court noted that contempt sanctions might have been available, but no contempt finding or request for such a sanction was made.
Holdings
- N.D.R.Crim.P. 23.1 prohibits the assessment of jury expenses in a criminal case, including where the defendant failed to appear for the scheduled jury trial.
- The reimbursement order could not be sustained as a contempt sanction because the State did not request a contempt sanction and the district court did not find Kopperud in contempt.
Questions Presented
- Whether N.D.R.Crim.P. 23.1 permits a criminal defendant to be assessed jury expenses after failing to appear for a scheduled jury trial.
- Whether the district court had authority to impose the jury-expense reimbursement as a contempt sanction or as reasonable prosecution costs.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- State v. Chacano, 2012 ND 113, ¶ 10, 817 N.W.2d 369(followed)
- Molitor v. Molitor, 2006 ND 163, ¶ 11, 718 N.W.2d 13(followed)
- State v. Stokes, 243 N.W.2d 372 (N.D. 1976)(distinguished)
- State v. Marinucci, 321 N.W.2d 462, 467 (N.D. 1982)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…