Summary
The North Dakota Supreme Court denied landowners’ motion to stay district court orders granting the Cass County Joint Water Resource District a right of entry onto their properties for environmental monitoring related to the Fargo-Moorhead Flood Diversion Project. The court concluded the landowners would not suffer irreparable injury because they could pursue an inverse condemnation action, and that a stay could substantially delay the project.
Holdings
- A stay pending appeal was denied because the Landowners failed to establish the required absence of an adequate remedy and substantial harm to the District from issuance of a stay.
- The Landowners did not demonstrate irreparable injury because they could pursue an inverse condemnation action for damages resulting from any temporary or permanent taking.
- Issuance of a stay would likely cause substantial harm to the District by delaying surveys, examinations, and other work necessary to advance the project.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Landowners were entitled to a stay pending appeal of the district court orders granting the District a right of entry onto their properties.
- Whether denial of a stay would cause the Landowners irreparable injury.
- Whether issuance of a stay would cause substantial harm to the District.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (4)
- Bergstrom v. Bergstrom, 271 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 1978)(followed)
- In re Estate of Shubert, 2013 ND 215, 839 N.W.2d 811(distinguished)
- Aasmundstad v. State, 2008 ND 206, 763 N.W.2d 748(followed)
- Richland/Wilkin Joint Powers Auth. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 13-cv-2262, 2019 WL 1516934, at *6 (D. Minn. Apr. 8, 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…