Jason James Vogt v. State of North Dakota

Vogt v. State, 2022 ND 163 (2022) · Supreme Court of North Dakota · August 18, 2022 · No. 20220058

Summary

The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of Jason Vogt’s application for post-conviction relief. The court held that the State timely asserted its affirmative defenses and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a continuance concerning the State’s summary-disposition motion. The court further held that Vogt’s psychological assessment did not satisfy the newly discovered evidence exception to the post-conviction statute of limitations, and declined to consider his equitable-estoppel argument because it was raised for the first time on appeal.

Holdings

  1. The State timely asserted res judicata, misuse of process, and the statute-of-limitations defense because it filed its answer within 30 days of Vogt's application and expressly included those defenses.
  2. The State's motion was properly considered as a motion for summary disposition, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by granting a continuance and allowing Vogt 30 days to respond.
  3. Vogt's psychological assessment did not satisfy the newly discovered evidence exception because it did not establish that he did not engage in the criminal conduct for which he was convicted; therefore, his application was barred by the two-year statute of limitations.
  4. The court would not address Vogt's equitable-estoppel argument because he did not assert in the district court that equitable estoppel entitled him to an evidentiary hearing.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the State timely asserted its affirmative defenses in response to Vogt's post-conviction application.
  2. Whether the State's motion for dismissal or summary disposition was untimely and whether the district court abused its discretion by granting a continuance.
  3. Whether Vogt's psychological assessment qualified as newly discovered evidence that excused the two-year post-conviction statute of limitations.
  4. Whether equitable estoppel should apply based on the State's alleged representations concerning a continuance.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (13)

  • Vogt v. State, 2016 ND 48, 876 N.W.2d 485(followed)
  • State v. Vogt, 2019 ND 236, ¶ 7, 933 N.W.2d 916(followed)
  • Morris v. State, 2019 ND 166, ¶ 6, 930 N.W.2d 195(followed)
  • Curtiss v. State, 2016 ND 62, ¶ 7, 877 N.W.2d 58(followed)
  • Burden v. State, 2019 ND 178, ¶ 10, 930 N.W.2d 619(followed)
  • Lehman v. State, 2014 ND 103, ¶ 8, 847 N.W.2d 119(distinguished)
  • Chisholm v. State, 2014 ND 125, ¶¶ 10-17, 848 N.W.2d 703(followed)
  • Pinkney v. State, 2021 ND 155, ¶ 8, 963 N.W.2d 737(followed)
  • Wong v. State, 2010 ND 219, ¶ 12, 790 N.W.2d 757(followed)
  • Bridges v. State, 2022 ND 147, ¶¶ 9, 13(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…