M.S. v. Ives

2025-Ohio-5312 · Ohio Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District, Licking County · November 24, 2025 · No. 25 COA 00011

Summary

The Ohio Fifth District Court of Appeals affirmed a domestic violence civil protection order issued in favor of M.S. against Neil Ives. The court rejected challenges to the denial of a continuance, admission of testimony concerning prior incidents, the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting the order and its extension to the children, and the trial court's consideration of common-sense observations in evaluating credibility. The court assessed costs to the appellant.

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Ives's motion for a continuance filed three days before the final hearing after he changed counsel at the eleventh hour and witnesses had already been subpoenaed.
  2. Any error in permitting M.S. to testify about allegedly undisclosed incidents was harmless and did not warrant disturbing the protection order.
  3. The issuance of the domestic violence civil protection order was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
  4. Sufficient evidence supported extending the domestic violence civil protection order to J.I. and A.P.
  5. The trial court did not improperly rely on facts outside the record or an impermissible medical or psychological opinion when assessing M.S.'s credibility.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion or violated due process by denying Ives's motion to continue the final protection-order hearing.
  2. Whether permitting M.S. to testify about allegedly undisclosed prior incidents of domestic violence required reversal.
  3. Whether the domestic violence civil protection order was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
  4. Whether sufficient evidence supported extending the protection order to the children.
  5. Whether the trial court improperly relied on facts outside the record or its own medical and psychological opinions when overruling Ives's objections.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (19)

  • Lemon v. Lemon, 2011-Ohio-1878 (5th Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Unger, 67 Ohio St.2d 65 (1981)(followed)
  • Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc., 19 Ohio St.3d 83, 87 (1985)(followed)
  • AAAA Ent., Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redev. Corp., 50 Ohio St.3d 157, 161 (1990)(followed)
  • In re Barnick, 2007-Ohio-1720, ¶ 10 (8th Dist.)(followed)
  • Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd., 1993-Ohio-122(followed)
  • Deacon v. Landers, 68 Ohio App.3d 26, 29-30 (4th Dist. 1990)(followed)
  • D.M.W. v. E.W., 2018-Ohio-821, ¶ 12 (10th Dist.)(followed)
  • In re Z.H., 2022-Ohio-184, ¶ 9 (9th Dist.)(followed)
  • O'Brien v. Angley, 63 Ohio St.2d 159, 164-165 (1980)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Ohio Court Of Appeals Fifth Appellate District Licking County Ohio Court Of Appeals Fifth Appellate