Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a Stark County family court judgment concerning a father's supervised parenting time. The court held that the trial court abused its discretion by relying on a guardian ad litem's post-hearing visitation recommendation without allowing the parties to argue regarding it or cross-examine the guardian ad litem. The court did not reach the appellant's remaining assignments of error.
Holdings
- Although Civil Rule 53 permits a trial court to receive additional evidence when ruling on objections to a magistrate's decision, the court abused its discretion by relying on the guardian ad litem's updated recommendation without giving Mother an opportunity to argue her position and cross-examine the guardian ad litem.
- The court declined to address Mother's first and third assignments of error because its disposition of the second assignment of error was dispositive.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by considering the guardian ad litem's post-trial updated visitation recommendation without allowing Mother to argue about the recommendation or cross-examine the guardian ad litem.
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by modifying the magistrate's visitation decision.
- Whether the trial court adequately explained its findings and conclusions when modifying the magistrate's decision.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (10)
- Love Properties, Inc. v. Kyles, 2007-Ohio-1966, ¶ 37 (5th Dist.)(followed)
- Rafeld v. Sours, 2014-Ohio-4242, ¶ 21 (5th Dist.)(followed)
- Morrison v. Morrison, 2014-Ohio-2254, ¶ 26 (9th Dist.)(followed)
- Kolano v. Vega, 2016-Ohio-356, ¶ 23 (5th Dist.)(followed)
- Meyers v. Sparrow, 2009-Ohio-945, ¶ 55(followed)
- Gerling & Assocs. v. S&R Servs., 2009-Ohio-1897, ¶ 39(followed)
- In re A.S., 2013-Ohio-1975, ¶ 26 (9th Dist.)(followed)
- Pagonis v. Steele, 2012-Ohio-4252, ¶ 9 (9th Dist.)(followed)
- Anderton v. Hatfield, 2007-Ohio-7139, ¶ 23 (10th Dist.)(followed)
- Flynn v. Flynn, 2004-Ohio-3881, ¶ 15 (10th Dist.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…