Summary
The First District Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed summary judgment in favor of Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, in its action to recover a debt allegedly assigned by U.S. Bank. The court held that the bill of sale and asset schedule, submitted with a more definite statement and considered with the summary-judgment evidence, established the validity of the assignment and absence of a genuine issue of material fact.
Holdings
- A filing made in compliance with an order granting a motion for a more definite statement becomes part of the pleadings and may be considered as part of the summary-judgment record.
- The bill of sale and asset schedule, together with the other summary-judgment evidence, established the absence of a genuine issue of material fact concerning the validity of the assignment.
- Summary judgment was proper because Absolute Resolutions established the elements of its claim and the absence of a genuine issue of material fact, while Marshall failed to present specific facts showing a triable issue.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment where the plaintiff's pleadings and supporting evidence established a valid assignment of the defendant's credit-card account.
- Whether an asset schedule filed in response to an order granting a motion for a more definite statement could be considered part of the pleadings and used in ruling on summary judgment.
- Whether the evidence, construed in favor of the nonmoving party, created a genuine issue of material fact concerning the assignment.
- Whether Midland Funding, LLC v. Snedeker required reversal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- Midland Funding LLC v. Farrell, 2013-Ohio-5509 (1st Dist.)(followed)
- Gabriele v. Reagan, 57 Ohio App.3d 84, 87 (12th Dist. 1988)(followed)
- Smith v. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co., 2013-Ohio-2510, ¶ 6 (1st Dist.)(followed)
- EMCC Invest. Ventures, 2012-Ohio-4462, ¶ 26 (11th Dist.)(followed)
- Citibank, N.A. v. Hine, 2019-Ohio-464, ¶ 31 (4th Dist.)(followed)
- Midland Funding LLC v. Coleman, 2019-Ohio-432, ¶ 16 (6th Dist.)(followed)
- First Union Natl. Bank v. Hufford, 146 Ohio App.3d 673, 679 (3d Dist. 2001)(followed)
- Hudson & Keyse, LLC v. Yarnevic-Rudolph, 2010-Ohio-5938, ¶ 24 (7th Dist.)(followed)
- Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Green, 2004-Ohio-1555, ¶ 32 (7th Dist.)(followed)
- Midland Funding, LLC v. Snedeker, 2014-Ohio-887 (5th Dist.)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…