Pinnell v. Cugini & Cappoccia Builders, Inc.

2014-Ohio-669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014) · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District · February 25, 2014 · No. 13AP-579

Summary

The Tenth District Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed the denial of appellants' motion to stay litigation pending mediation and arbitration. The court held that appellants waived their contractual arbitration rights by actively participating in the litigation, including filing a counterclaim, engaging in discovery, seeking court intervention, and delaying their motion to stay.

Holdings

  1. Appellants waived their right to compel arbitration because, with knowledge of that right, they acted inconsistently with it by invoking the trial court's jurisdiction, filing a counterclaim, participating extensively in discovery and other litigation, seeking merits relief through summary judgment, and waiting more than a year before requesting a stay.
  2. A contractual provision requiring waiver to be in writing may itself be waived through the parties' subsequent conduct; therefore, the operating agreement's written-waiver clause did not prevent appellants from waiving arbitration by their litigation conduct.
  3. An alleged failure or rescission of the operating agreement does not, by itself, eliminate the arbitration provision because the arbitration clause is treated as a separate contract within the broader agreement and must be challenged on its own merits.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether appellants waived their contractual right to compel arbitration by invoking the trial court's jurisdiction, filing a counterclaim and summary-judgment motion, participating extensively in discovery, and delaying their request for a stay.
  2. Whether the operating agreement's written-waiver provision prevented waiver of the arbitration right through litigation conduct.
  3. Whether alleged material breaches or rescission of the operating agreement rendered its arbitration provision unenforceable.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (22)

  • Hayes v. Oakridge Home, 122 Ohio St. 3d 63, 2009-Ohio-2054, ¶¶ 15-16(followed)
  • Taylor Bldg. Corp. of Am. v. Benfield, 117 Ohio St. 3d 352, 2008-Ohio-938, ¶ 27(followed)
  • Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co., 83 Ohio St. 3d 464, 471 (1998)(followed)
  • Kelm v. Kelm, 68 Ohio St. 3d 26, 29 (1993)(followed)
  • Schaefer v. Allstate Ins. Co., 63 Ohio St. 3d 708, 712 (1992)(followed)
  • Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities v. Mahoning Cty. TMR Edn. Assn., 22 Ohio St. 3d 80, 83 (1986)(followed)
  • Ignazio v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc., 113 Ohio St. 3d 276, 2007-Ohio-1947, ¶ 18(followed)
  • Dispatch Printing Co. v. Recovery Ltd. Partnership, 10th Dist. No. 10AP-353, 2011-Ohio-80, ¶¶ 17, 19, 21(followed)
  • Murtha v. Ravines of McNaughton Condominium Assn., 10th Dist. No. 09AP-709, 2010-Ohio-1325, ¶¶ 20-21(followed)
  • Morris v. Morris, 189 Ohio App. 3d 608, 2010-Ohio-4750, ¶ 17(followed)

Showing top 10 of 22.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Ohio Court Of Appeals Of Ohio Tenth Appellate District