Discover Bank v. Hanson

2026-Ohio-140 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second Appellate District, Montgomery County · January 16, 2026 · No. 30515

Summary

The Ohio Second District Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Discover Bank in an action to collect a credit card debt. The court held that the affidavit and account records submitted by Discover were properly authenticated and admissible under the business-records exception to the hearsay rule. The court further concluded that Discover established the account, governing agreement, balance, and default, while Hanson failed to present specific evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact.

Holdings

  1. The account statements and cardmember agreement were properly authenticated and admissible under the business-records exception to the hearsay rule because Moore demonstrated personal knowledge of Discover's record-keeping system and established that the records were maintained in the ordinary course of business.
  2. Discover was entitled to summary judgment because its affidavit, cardmember agreement, and account statements established the existence of a binding credit-card contract, Hanson's ownership and use of the account, the running balance, default, and damages, while Hanson identified no evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Moore's affidavit and the attached credit-card records were properly authenticated and admissible under Ohio Evid.R. 901, Evid.R. 803(6), and Civ.R. 56.
  2. Whether genuine issues of material fact concerning the validity, amount, ownership, or enforceability of the alleged credit-card debt precluded summary judgment.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (32)

  • People's Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Tome, 2011-Ohio-5412, ¶ 13 (4th Dist.)(followed)
  • Lawson v. Y.D. Song, M.D., Inc., 1997 WL 596293, *3 (4th Dist. Sept. 23, 1997)(followed)
  • State v. Sage, 31 Ohio St.3d 173, paragraph two of the syllabus (1987)(followed)
  • State v. Finnerty, 45 Ohio St.3d 104, 107 (1989)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Southview Hosp., 2012-Ohio-4974, ¶ 20 (2d Dist.)(followed)
  • Knoth v. Prime Time Marketing Mgt., Inc., 2004-Ohio-2426, ¶ 13 (2d Dist.)(followed)
  • Weisbecker v. Weisbecker, 2006-Ohio-5840, ¶ 22 (12th Dist.)(followed)
  • SFJV 2005, L.L.C. v. Ream, 2010-Ohio-1615, ¶ 46 (2d Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Carter, 2000 WL 1466189, *5 (4th Dist. Sept. 26, 2000)(followed)
  • State v. Hood, 2012-Ohio-6208, ¶ 39(followed)

Showing top 10 of 32.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Ohio Court Of Appeals Second Appellate District Montgomery County Court Of Appeals Of Ohio Second Ap