State v. Adkins

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeals affirmed Ronald Adkins's convictions for obstructing official business and resisting arrest. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to establish the statutory elements of both offenses, including a risk of physical harm for the obstruction conviction. The court also concluded that the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Holdings

1. The evidence was sufficient to support Adkins's conviction for obstructing official business and the finding that the violation created a risk of physical harm.
2. The evidence was sufficient to support Adkins's conviction for resisting arrest.
3. The convictions for obstructing official business and resisting arrest were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Questions Presented

1. Whether sufficient evidence supported Adkins's convictions for obstructing official business and resisting arrest.
2. Whether the convictions were against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Disposition

affirmed