Summary
The Tenth District Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed a juvenile court judgment granting Franklin County Children Services permanent custody of R.S. The court held that denying the father’s last-minute request for a continuance did not violate due process or constitute an abuse of discretion, given the case’s history, the child’s need for permanency, and the father’s minimal case-plan progress.
Holdings
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion or violate due process by denying father's last-minute request to continue the permanent-custody hearing. The circumstances favored prompt resolution, and father failed to show that a continuance likely would have changed the outcome.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion and violated father's due-process rights by denying his request to continue the permanent-custody hearing so that he could attend and testify.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- State v. Ungar, 67 Ohio St.2d 65, 67 (1981)(followed)
- Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219 (1983)(followed)
- In re M.K., 2010-Ohio-2194, ¶ 14 (10th Dist.)(followed)
- Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 589 (1964)(followed)
- In re J.B., 2009-Ohio-3083, ¶ 26 (10th Dist.)(followed)
- In re C.W., 2025-Ohio-282, ¶ 50 (10th Dist.)(followed)
- In re J.C., 2011-Ohio-715, ¶ 46 (10th Dist.)(followed)
- In re J.J., 2022-Ohio-907, ¶¶ 22, 24(followed)
- In re K.J., 2018-Ohio-471, ¶¶ 22-23 (10th Dist.)(followed)
- In re B.G.W., 2008-Ohio-3693, ¶ 27 (10th Dist.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…