Summary
The Ninth District Court of Appeals of Ohio dismissed Martin Robinson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court held that Robinson, an incarcerated inmate seeking a filing-fee waiver, failed to satisfy the mandatory affidavit and account-balance requirements of Ohio Revised Code 2969.25(C)(1).
Holdings
- An inmate's civil action against a government entity or employee must be dismissed when the inmate fails to comply with the mandatory filing requirements of R.C. 2969.25.
- Substantial compliance does not satisfy R.C. 2969.25(C); an inmate must strictly adhere to the statutory requirements.
Questions Presented
- Whether Robinson's habeas corpus action had to be dismissed because his affidavit of indigency failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C)(1).
- Whether substantial compliance with R.C. 2969.25(C) was sufficient to avoid dismissal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St. 3d 63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6(followed)
- State ex rel. Roden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 159 Ohio St. 3d 314, 2020-Ohio-408, ¶¶ 6, 8(followed)
- State ex rel. Neil v. French, 153 Ohio St. 3d 271, 2018-Ohio-2692, ¶ 7(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…