Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio reinstated Bradley M. Kraemer to the practice of law after finding substantial compliance with a prior suspension order and applicable bar rules. Reinstatement was conditioned on continued mental health counseling and two years of monitored probation, with the remaining suspension to be served if the conditions were violated.

Holdings

1. Because Kraemer substantially complied with the prior suspension order and the applicable bar rule, he was reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.
2. Reinstatement was conditioned on continued participation in mental-health counseling and completion of a two-year period of probation monitored by relator; failure to satisfy the conditions would lift the stay and require service of the remaining one-year suspension.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Kraemer had substantially complied with the prior suspension order and applicable bar rules so as to warrant reinstatement.
2. What conditions should govern Kraemer's reinstatement and probation.

Disposition

other