Summary
The Ohio Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as having been improvidently accepted in a juvenile serious-youthful-offender case involving reciprocal discovery and statutory speedy-trial requirements. The majority issued no merits ruling, while the dissent would have held that the juvenile’s failure to respond to the state’s discovery request tolled speedy-trial time and would have reversed the appellate court.
Holdings
- The appeal was dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should reach the State's discretionary appeal concerning whether a juvenile's failure to respond to a reciprocal discovery request tolls speedy-trial time in a serious-youthful-offender proceeding.
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (6)
- State v. Palmer, 112 Ohio St. 3d 457, 2007-Ohio-374, 860 N.E.2d 1011(followed)
- In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St. 3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471(followed)
- In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527 (1967)(followed)
- In re C.S., 115 Ohio St. 3d 267, 2007-Ohio-4919, 874 N.E.2d 1177(followed)
- Lakewood v. Papadelis, 32 Ohio St. 3d 1, 4, 511 N.E.2d 1138 (1987)(followed)
- State v. Athon, 136 Ohio St. 3d 43, 2013-Ohio-1956, 989 N.E.2d 1006(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…