State ex rel. K&D Group, Inc. v. Buehrer

135 Ohio St. 3d 257, 2013-Ohio-734 (2013) · Supreme Court of Ohio · March 6, 2013 · No. 2011-1918

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that K&D Group, Inc. was not a successor in interest to Mid-America Management Corporation for workers’ compensation experience-rating purposes. Because there was no evidence that Mid-America voluntarily transferred its business operations to K&D Group, the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation abused its discretion by transferring part of Mid-America’s experience rating. The court reversed the court of appeals and issued a writ of mandamus ordering the bureau to calculate K&D Group’s experience rate without Mid-America’s experience.

Holdings

  1. K&D Group was not a successor in interest because it merely contracted with the new owner to manage the existing apartment complex, and there was no evidence that Mid-America voluntarily transferred its business operation to K&D Group.
  2. The Bureau abused its discretion by transferring part of Mid-America's experience rating to K&D Group.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether K&D Group was a successor in interest to Mid-America for purposes of transferring workers' compensation experience ratings.
  2. Whether the Bureau abused its discretion by transferring part of Mid-America's experience rating to K&D Group.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (4)

  • State ex rel. Crosset Co., Inc. v. Conrad, 87 Ohio St. 3d 467, 721 N.E.2d 986 (2000)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Lake Erie Constr. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 62 Ohio St. 3d 81, 578 N.E.2d 458 (1991)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Lynnhaven XIV, L.L.C. v. Conrad, 10th Dist. No. 02AP-36, 2003-Ohio-825, 2003 WL 462506(followed)
  • State ex rel. Valley Roofing, L.L.C. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., 122 Ohio St. 3d 275, 2009-Ohio-2684, 910 N.E.2d 1018(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…