Summary
The Ohio Supreme Court held that an injured worker who voluntarily abandoned the workforce and ultimately the entire job market was ineligible for permanent-total-disability compensation. The court concluded that the Industrial Commission had previously determined that the worker’s disabling symptoms were caused by smoking rather than allowed workers’ compensation conditions, and therefore erred in finding that his retirement was involuntary. The court reversed the court of appeals and granted a writ of mandamus directing the Commission to deny permanent-total-disability compensation.
Holdings
- An employee who retires before becoming permanently and totally disabled is ineligible for permanent-total-disability compensation when the retirement is voluntary and constitutes abandonment of the entire job market. Because the Commission had previously determined that Grashel's symptoms causing him to stop working were caused by a nonallowed smoking condition, the Commission abused its discretion by finding that he had not voluntarily abandoned the workforce.
- The Industrial Commission may not rely on medical evidence that it previously rejected to establish that the allowed conditions caused the claimant's symptoms when making a later determination concerning voluntary abandonment.
- The evidence established that Grashel abandoned the entire job market because he did not seek other employment or vocational rehabilitation after leaving work and elected early Social Security retirement for financial reasons.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion by finding that Grashel had not voluntarily abandoned the workforce when he stopped working and retired.
- Whether the Commission could rely on medical evidence from Dr. Pue after previously rejecting that evidence in determining that Grashel's symptoms were caused by his allowed conditions.
- Whether Grashel's failure to seek other employment or vocational rehabilitation constituted abandonment of the entire job market, precluding permanent-total-disability compensation.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (7)
- State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 69 Ohio St. 3d 202, 631 N.E.2d 138 (1994)(followed)
- State ex rel. Zamora v. Indus. Comm., 45 Ohio St. 3d 17, 543 N.E.2d 87 (1989)(followed)
- State ex rel. Verbanek v. Indus. Comm., 73 Ohio St. 3d 562, 653 N.E.2d 374 (1995)(distinguished)
- State ex rel. Kelsey Hayes Co. v. Grashel, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 08AP-484, 2009-Ohio-818, 2009 WL 444355(prior procedural history)
- State ex rel. Fries v. Bur. of Workers' Comp., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 01AP-721, 2002-Ohio-3252(discussed)
- State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc., 31 Ohio St. 3d 18, 508 N.E.2d 936 (1987)(discussed)
- State ex rel. Dingus v. Quinn Dev. Co., 70 Ohio St. 3d 580, 639 N.E.2d 1184 (1994)(discussed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…