Summary
The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of Martine Gooden’s mandamus action seeking victim-loss statements from the Marion County Clerk of Courts. The court held that Gooden failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C) by omitting the required inmate-account statement and failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the requested documents existed or were in the clerk’s possession or control.
Holdings
- An inmate who seeks waiver of filing fees in a mandamus action must comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), including attaching a statement of the inmate account; failure to do so is a fatal defect warranting dismissal.
- A relator seeking public records through mandamus must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the requested records exist and that the respondent has a legal duty to produce them; an unsubstantiated allegation that the records exist is insufficient.
Questions Presented
- Whether Gooden's mandamus petition was fatally defective because he failed to attach the inmate-account statement and other documentation required by R.C. 2969.25.
- Whether Gooden was entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling the clerk to produce victim-loss statements when he failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the statements existed or were in the clerk's possession or control.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- State ex rel. Physicians Commt. for Responsible Medicine v. Ohio State Univ. Bd. of Trustees, 108 Ohio St. 3d 288, 2006-Ohio-903, 843 N.E.2d 174, ¶ 6(followed)
- State ex rel. Data Trace Information Servs., L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer, 131 Ohio St. 3d 255, 2012-Ohio-753, 963 N.E.2d 1288, ¶ 25(followed)
- State ex rel. Am. Civ. Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 128 Ohio St. 3d 256, 2011-Ohio-625, 943 N.E.2d 553, ¶ 24(followed)
- State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's Office, 133 Ohio St. 3d 139, 2012-Ohio-4246, 976 N.E.2d 877, ¶ 26(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…