Summary
The Supreme Court of Ohio held that Lumumba Touré McCord violated professional-conduct rules by failing to maintain a client trust account, failing to inform clients that he lacked professional liability insurance, and willfully failing to file and pay federal income taxes. The court imposed a one-year suspension from the practice of law, stayed in full subject to tax compliance, timely payment of current taxes, a two-year probation term including law-office-management continuing legal education, and no further misconduct.
Holdings
- A lawyer must deposit advance legal fees and expenses into a client trust account unless the requirements for treating a fee as earned upon receipt or nonrefundable have been satisfied. McCord violated Prof.Cond.R. 1.15(a) by depositing unearned client funds into his business account without satisfying those conditions.
- An Ohio lawyer who does not maintain professional liability insurance must inform the client of that fact. McCord violated Prof.Cond.R. 1.4(c) by failing to inform his clients.
- McCord's misdemeanor conviction for willfully failing to file a return, supply information, or pay income taxes violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(b), which prohibits an illegal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer's honesty or trustworthiness.
- A one-year suspension from the practice of law, fully stayed on specified conditions, was appropriate for McCord's multiple violations.
Questions Presented
- Whether McCord violated Ohio's professional-conduct rules by failing to deposit advance client funds into a client trust account.
- Whether McCord violated the professional-conduct rules by failing to inform clients that he did not maintain professional liability insurance.
- Whether McCord's willful failure to file federal income tax returns and pay federal income taxes violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(b).
- What sanction was appropriate for the established misconduct.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- In re Attorney Registration Suspension of McCord, 107 Ohio St. 3d 1431, 2005-Ohio-6408, 838 N.E.2d 671(followed)
- In re Reinstatement of McCord, 107 Ohio St. 3d 1705, 2006-Ohio-13, 840 N.E.2d 209(followed)
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. McCord, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1249, 2014-Ohio-5407, 21 N.E.2d 1098(followed)
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. McCord, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1484, 2015-Ohio-783, 26 N.E.3d 820(followed)
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. McCord, 142 Ohio St. 3d 1238, 2015-Ohio-1428, 30 N.E.3d 959(followed)
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Veneziano, 120 Ohio St. 3d 451, 2008-Ohio-6789, 900 N.E.2d 185(applied by analogy)
- Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Ezzone, 102 Ohio St. 3d 79, 2004-Ohio-1774, 806 N.E.2d 991(applied by analogy)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Hillman, 2016-Ohio-1172(applied by analogy)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…