Summary
The Supreme Court of Ohio indefinitely suspended Mark Alan Deters from practicing law based on multiple violations of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct. The misconduct included neglecting client matters, failing to communicate with clients, failing to refund unearned fees, mishandling client funds, and conduct related to criminal convictions. Reinstatement was conditioned on treatment compliance, professional and mental-health assessments, and full restitution.
Holdings
- The court adopted the board's findings of fact and misconduct and held that Deters violated the specified Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct through his criminal and contempt-related conduct, neglect of client matters, failure to communicate, failure to protect client interests, mishandling of advance fees, and failure to refund unearned fees.
- An indefinite suspension from the practice of law was the appropriate sanction for Deters's pattern of misconduct, numerous violations, harm to vulnerable clients, criminal conduct, neglect, and failure to refund unearned fees.
- Reinstatement after the indefinite suspension was conditioned on compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(25)(D)(1), compliance with treatment recommendations, a qualified professional prognosis that Deters could return to competent and ethical practice, and full restitution to affected clients or reimbursement of the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection.
Questions Presented
- Whether Deters committed the stipulated violations of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct arising from his criminal conduct, neglect of client matters, failure to communicate, failure to protect client interests, mishandling of client funds, and failure to refund unearned fees.
- What sanction is appropriate for Deters's multiple professional-conduct violations, considering the aggravating and mitigating factors and sanctions imposed in comparable cases.
- What conditions should govern Deters's reinstatement following an indefinite suspension.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Deters, 151 Ohio St. 3d 1216, 2017-Ohio-7892, 85 N.E.3d 748(followed procedurally)
- State v. Deters, Fairborn M.C. No. CR 1501086(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Fairborn M.C. No. CR 1501120(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Xenia M.C. No. 15-TRC-03189(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Xenia M.C. No. 15-CRB-01227(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Lucas C.P. No. DV2015-0464(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Xenia M.C. No. 15-CRB-01506(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Sylvania M.C. Nos. CRB 1501833A and CRB 1501833B(relied upon)
- State v. Deters, Kettering M.C. No. 17CRB-00605(relied upon)
- Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Lemieux, 139 Ohio St. 3d 320, 2014-Ohio-2127, 11 N.E.3d 1157(analogized)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…