Disciplinary Counsel v. Owens

Disciplinary Counsel v. Owens., 2018 Ohio 5080 (Ohio 2018) · Supreme Court of Ohio · December 19, 2018 · No. 2018-0257

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that Robert Morris Owens violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c), (d), and (h) by misrepresenting that a client’s spousal-support arrearage had been paid, delaying enforcement proceedings, and recklessly placing other clients’ trust-account funds at risk. The court suspended Owens from practicing law for one year, stayed the suspension in full subject to a two-hour client-trust-account CLE requirement and one year of monitored probation.

Holdings

  1. The board's findings that Owens violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c), (d), and (h) were supported by the record and were adopted.
  2. Owens's conduct constituted a material misrepresentation because he presented the trust-account check as payment and, after learning that the funds had not been deposited, failed to correct the resulting false representation.
  3. The record did not establish improper bias by the board.
  4. Owens was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the entire suspension stayed on conditions requiring additional client-trust-account CLE and one year of monitored probation.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether sufficient evidence supported the board's findings that Owens violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c), (d), and (h).
  2. Whether Owens made a material misrepresentation by presenting a client-trust-account check and failing to correct the resulting representation after learning that the client's funds had not been deposited.
  3. Whether the board was biased against Owens by disregarding his testimony and amended closing brief.
  4. What sanction was appropriate for Owens's misconduct.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (11)

  • Bittner v. Bittner, 2015-Ohio-4707, 49 N.E.3d 821 (5th Dist.)(background)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Zingarelli, 89 Ohio St.3d 210, 217, 729 N.E.2d 1167 (2000)(followed)
  • Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469, 478, 120 N.E.2d 118 (1954)(followed)
  • Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Wise, 108 Ohio St.3d 164, 2006-Ohio-550, 842 N.E.2d 35, ¶ 24(followed)
  • Miles v. McSwegin, 58 Ohio St.2d 97, 99, 388 N.E.2d 1367 (1979)(applied by analogy)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine, 131 Ohio St.3d 302, 2012-Ohio-977, 964 N.E.2d 427(compared)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Koehler, 132 Ohio St.3d 465, 2012-Ohio-3235, 973 N.E.2d 262(compared)
  • Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cox, 98 Ohio St.3d 420, 2003-Ohio-1553, 786 N.E.2d 454(distinguished)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Cuckler, 101 Ohio St.3d 318, 2004-Ohio-784, 804 N.E.2d 966(distinguished)
  • Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cochran, 152 Ohio St.3d 448, 2018-Ohio-4, 97 N.E.3d 454(followed by analogy)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…