Ohio High Sch. Athletic Assn. v. Ruehlman

106 N.E.3d 63 (Ohio 2018) · Supreme Court of Ohio · August 27, 2018

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court addressed an emergency-stay motion and request for an expedited alternative writ of prohibition concerning a trial court's temporary restraining order against enforcement of the Ohio High School Athletic Association's Competitive Balance Rules. The majority granted the motion and stayed enforcement of the restraining order pending resolution, while dissenting opinions would have denied or limited the stay and, in one instance, granted a peremptory writ.

Holdings

  1. In the dissent's view, the alternative writ should be denied because the trial court's finding that the arbitrariness exception applied established jurisdiction in the circumstances of the case.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should grant an emergency stay of the trial court's temporary restraining order.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should issue an expedited alternative writ of prohibition when the trial court had already found that the arbitrariness exception to deference toward the Ohio High School Athletic Association applied.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (3)

  • State ex rel. Ohio High School Athletic Assn. v. Judges of Court of Common Pleas, 173 Ohio St. 239, 181 N.E.2d 261 (1962)(followed)
  • Massillon City School Dist. v. Ohio High School Athletic Assn., 5th Dist. Stark No. 7247, 1987 Ohio App. LEXIS 9541, at *6-7, 1987 WL 19827 (Nov. 5, 1987)(cited)
  • Biesiada v. Ohio Soccer Assn. N., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 65880, 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 3348 (July 28, 1994)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…