Summary
The Oklahoma Supreme Court answered a certified question concerning whether Oklahoma law grants boards of directors exclusive authority to create and implement shareholder rights plans. The court held that shareholders may propose bylaws restricting the board's implementation of such plans, assuming the certificate of incorporation does not provide otherwise.
Holdings
- Oklahoma law does not grant the board of directors exclusive authority to create and implement shareholder rights plans when shareholder objection is brought through official channels of corporate governance.
- Shareholders may propose bylaws restricting the board's implementation of shareholder rights plans, including a requirement that such plans be submitted to shareholders for approval, assuming the certificate of incorporation does not provide otherwise.
Questions Presented
- Whether Oklahoma law gives the board of directors exclusive authority to create and implement shareholder rights plans.
- Whether shareholders may propose resolutions or bylaw amendments requiring a shareholder vote on a shareholder rights plan at a succeeding annual meeting, assuming the certificate of incorporation does not provide otherwise.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. First National Bank of Texhoma, 197 Okla. 652, 174 P.2d 259 (1946)(followed)
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. Tulsa Flower Exchange, 192 Okla. 293, 135 P.2d 46 (1943)(followed)
- Sumner Coal-Mining Co. v. Pleasant, 127 Okla. 174, 259 P. 1055 (1927)(followed)
- Oberly v. Kirby, 592 A.2d 445, 458 (Del. 1991)(persuasive)
- Michelson v. Duncan, 407 A.2d 211, 218-20 (Del. 1979)(persuasive)
- Robert A. Wachsler, Inc. v. Florafax International, Inc., 778 F.2d 547 (10th Cir. 1985)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…