Summary
The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that a statutory physician's lien under 42 O.S. 2001 § 46(B) attaches to proceeds from a patient's uninsured motorist coverage. The court reversed the trial court's contrary judgment and remanded for further proceedings. Separate opinions disputed the statutory interpretation and raised issues concerning small-claims authority and lien perfection.
Holdings
- Section 46(B) authorizes a physician's lien against monies payable by an insurer to an injured patient, including proceeds of the patient's uninsured-motorist coverage.
- The exemption in 31 O.S. 2001 § 1.A.21 does not prevent enforcement of a statutory physician's lien against personal-injury proceeds of less than $50,000. The exemption remains a bar to attachment or execution by other creditors.
- The small-claims division's handling of a physician's lien enforcement action presents an internal allocation-of-caseload issue rather than a subject-matter jurisdictional defect. The proper remedy is transfer to the appropriate district-court division, not dismissal or treatment of the judgment as a nullity.
- The Supreme Court declined to decide whether the Clinic's lien was properly perfected because that issue was not raised in the trial court and was not the basis of the trial court's judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether a physician's lien under 42 O.S. 2001 § 46(B) attaches to proceeds payable to a patient under the patient's uninsured-motorist coverage.
- Whether the statutory exemption for a person's interest in a claim for personal bodily injury under 31 O.S. 2001 § 1.A.21 prevents enforcement of the physician's lien against the UM proceeds.
- Whether the small-claims division's authority to hear a physician's lien enforcement action is a subject-matter jurisdictional limitation requiring dismissal or instead an internal allocation-of-caseload issue requiring transfer.
- Whether the validity or perfection of the Clinic's lien could be decided for the first time on appeal.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (31)
- Booth v. McKnight, 2003 OK 49, 70 P.3d 855, 860(followed)
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital Authority, 1993 OK 85, 859 P.2d 1081, 1084(followed)
- Salve Regina College v. Russell, 499 U.S. 225, 231 (1991)(followed)
- Kratz v. Kratz, 1995 OK 63, 905 P.2d 753(distinguished)
- Wise v. Wollery, 1995 OK CIV APP 69, 904 P.2d 151(distinguished)
- Dennis v. Harding Glass Co., 1996 OK CIV APP 105, 929 P.2d 301(distinguished)
- Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. Bohmar Minerals, Inc., 1983 OK 29, 661 P.2d 521, 523(followed)
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great National Corp., Inc., 1980 OK 112, 614 P.2d 576, 579(followed)
- George E. Failing Co. v. Watkins, 2000 OK 76, 14 P.3d 52, 56(followed)
- Cox v. Dawson, 1996 OK 11, 911 P.2d 272, 276(followed)
Showing top 10 of 31.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…