Summary
The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that a Ten Commandments monument placed on the Oklahoma State Capitol grounds violated Article 2, Section 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution, which prohibits the use of public money or property for the benefit or support of a system of religion. The court reversed the district court's summary judgment, enjoined the monument, and directed that it be removed.
Holdings
- The monument violated Article 2, Section 5 because its placement on public property operated for the use, benefit, or support of a sect or system of religion.
- Federal Establishment Clause jurisprudence did not control the interpretation or application of Article 2, Section 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution.
- The district court's summary judgment was improper and had to be reversed.
Questions Presented
- Whether placement of the Ten Commandments monument on the Oklahoma State Capitol grounds violated Article 2, Section 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution.
- Whether the district court properly entered summary judgment for the Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission and denied injunctive relief.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Okla. State Bd. of Equalization, 2009 OK 72, 231 P.3d 638(followed)
- Draper v. State, 1980 OK 117, 621 P.2d 1142(followed)
- Lepak v. McClain, 1992 OK 166, 844 P.2d 852(followed)
- Coffee v. Henry, 2010 OK 4, 240 P.3d 1056(followed)
- Haynes v. Caporal, 1977 OK 166, 571 P.2d 430(followed)
- Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005)(distinguished)
- Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 1040-41 (1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…