State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Nichols

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court immediately suspended Robert John Nichols from the practice of law under Rule 6.2A of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings. The suspension followed allegations that Nichols settled matters without client approval and converted client funds, creating an immediate threat of substantial and irreparable public harm. The Court also ordered restrictions on withdrawals from his client trust accounts, directed the Oklahoma Bar Association to seek appointment of a receiver, and required notices to clients and opposing counsel.

Holdings

1. An immediate interim suspension was warranted because Nichols's conduct posed an immediate threat of substantial and irreparable public harm.
2. Nichols was prohibited from withdrawing funds from his client trust account or accounts until an audit could be performed.
3. The Oklahoma Bar Association was directed to seek appointment of a receiver over Nichols's law practice, assets, and accounts, and Nichols was ordered to notify opposing counsel and clients of the suspension and related protective proceedings.

Questions Presented

1. Whether an immediate interim suspension from the practice of law was warranted under Rule 6.2A of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings.
2. Whether Nichols should be prohibited from withdrawing funds from his client trust accounts pending an audit.
3. What protective measures were necessary to protect Nichols's clients and implement the interim suspension.

Disposition

other