Fleming v. Hyde

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court summarily vacated the dismissal of Jennifer Fleming's action and remanded for further proceedings. Relying on Ramey v. Sutton, the court held that Fleming had standing to pursue a best-interests-of-the-child hearing based on the couple's committed relationship, joint family planning, and shared parental responsibilities.

Holdings

1. Fleming had standing to pursue a best-interests-of-the-child hearing because the facts demonstrated a committed relationship, joint family planning, an intent to parent jointly, and shared parental responsibilities after the child's birth.
2. The district court erred by granting the motion to dismiss; its dismissal order was vacated and the cause was remanded for further proceedings.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Fleming had standing to pursue a best-interests-of-the-child hearing based on her relationship with Hyde and the child.
2. Whether the district court properly dismissed Fleming's action.

Disposition

vacated