In re Initiative Petition No. 403, State Question No. 779

2016 OK 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · January 12, 2016 · No. 114425

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court reviewed a constitutional challenge to Initiative Petition No. 403, which proposed adding Article 13-C to create the Oklahoma Education Improvement Fund and impose an additional one-cent sales and use tax. The Court held that the initiative satisfied the one-general-subject rule in Article 24, section 1 of the Oklahoma Constitution and was legally sufficient for submission to Oklahoma voters.

Holdings

  1. Initiative Petition No. 403 did not violate Article 24, section 1 of the Oklahoma Constitution because its provisions were germane to the single general subject of creating and implementing the Oklahoma Education Improvement Fund.
  2. Initiative Petition No. 403 was legally sufficient for submission to the people of Oklahoma, and its proponents could proceed with the remaining statutory requirements.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Initiative Petition No. 403 violated Article 24, section 1 of the Oklahoma Constitution by embracing more than one general subject.
  2. Whether the initiative petition was legally sufficient for submission to the people of Oklahoma.

Disposition

approved

Cases Cited (13)

  • In re Initiative Petition No. 358, 1994 OK 27, 870 P.2d 782(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 360, 1994 OK 97, 879 P.2d 810(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 382, 2006 OK 45, 142 P.3d 400(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 362, 1995 OK 77, 899 P.2d 1145(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 314, 1980 OK 174, 625 P.2d 595(discussed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 319, 1984 OK 23, 682 P.2d 222(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 363, 1996 OK 122, 927 P.2d 558(followed)
  • Rupe v. Shaw, 1955 OK 223, 286 P.2d 1094(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 271, 1962 OK 178, 373 P.2d 1017(followed)
  • In re Initiative Petition No. 344, 1990 OK 75, 797 P.2d 326(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…