Summary
The Oklahoma Supreme Court reviewed the denial of Caleb Alexander Harlin's application to take the Oklahoma bar examination. The Court held that an attorney licensed in a non-reciprocal jurisdiction applying under Rule 4, section 1, was not required to satisfy the undergraduate-degree requirement applicable to law-student applicants under section 2. The Court reversed the Board of Bar Examiners' decision and granted Harlin's application to take the examination.
Holdings
- An attorney applying under Rule 4, section 1, is not required to satisfy the law-student registration requirements in section 2, including the undergraduate-degree requirement in section 2(a).
- Harlin satisfied the applicable requirements of Rule 4 and had no outstanding requirements preventing him from taking the Oklahoma bar examination.
Questions Presented
- Whether an attorney licensed in a non-reciprocal jurisdiction applying to take the Oklahoma bar examination under Rule 4, section 1, must satisfy the undergraduate-degree requirement imposed on law-student applicants under Rule 4, section 2(a).
- Whether Harlin satisfied the remaining requirements of Rule 4 for admission by examination.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (4)
- Application of Sanger, 1993 OK 158, 865 P.2d 338, 64 OBJ 3641(followed)
- In re Application of Jackson, SCBD 5985, Order, ¶ 8(discussed)
- Ellington v. Horwitz Enterprises, 2003 OK 37, 68 P.3d 983(followed)
- Cornett v. Carr, 2013 OK 30, 302 P.3d 769(discussed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…