Upton v. City of Tulsa

2018 OK 69 (Okla. 2018) · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · September 18, 2018 · No. 115557; companion cases 115558 and 115717

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court affirmed the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Commission En Banc decision concerning Jared Upton's permanent partial disability award. The court held that the constitutional issues regarding the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act's mandatory use of the American Medical Association's latest medical guide had already been resolved in Hill v. American Medical Response, and affirmed on that basis.

Holdings

  1. The provisions of the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act requiring use of the AMA Guide to evaluate and award permanent partial disability benefits are constitutional.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the provisions of the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act requiring use of the latest edition of the American Medical Association's Guide to evaluate and award permanent partial disability benefits are constitutional.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (1)

  • Hill v. American Medical Response, 2018 OK 57(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…