Summary
The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that Warehouse Market's interpleader action was substantively a tax protest after the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Tax Commission was dismissed on sovereign-immunity grounds. Because exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to judicial relief from a tax assessment, the Court reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss the action and transfer the deposited sales-tax funds to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, subject to statutory fees.
Holdings
- After the Tribal Tax Commission was dismissed on sovereign-immunity grounds, Warehouse Market's action was no longer a proper interpleader and became substantively a tax protest because it challenged the OTC's authority to impose and collect sales tax.
- A taxpayer challenging an Oklahoma Tax Commission assessment must exhaust the prescribed administrative remedies before seeking relief in the district court, and exhaustion is a jurisdictional prerequisite.
- The district court must dismiss the action and transfer the state sales-tax funds deposited with the court clerk to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, subject to statutory poundage and other appropriate fees.
Questions Presented
- Whether Warehouse Market's action, initially styled as an interpleader, was substantively a tax protest after the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Tax Commission was dismissed on sovereign-immunity grounds.
- Whether exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to judicial relief from an Oklahoma Tax Commission sales-tax assessment.
- Whether the district court should dismiss the action and transfer the deposited state sales-tax funds to the Oklahoma Tax Commission.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (23)
- Waggoner v. Johnston, 1965 OK 192, ¶8, 408 P.2d 761(followed)
- Mid-Central Towing Co. v. National Savings of Tulsa, 1959 OK 244, ¶7, 348 P.2d 327(cited)
- Protest of Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co., 1931 OK 507, ¶4, 2 P.2d 129(followed)
- Jones v. Kennedy, 1926 OK 522, ¶0, 247 P. 53(cited)
- Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 1924 OK 270, ¶0, 224 P. 969(cited)
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texaco Exploration & Production Co., 2005 OK 52, ¶7, 131 P.3d 705(followed)
- Cimarron Industries, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 1980 OK 190, ¶6, 621 P.2d 539(followed)
- Request of Hamm Production Co., 1983 OK 92, 671 P.2d 50(followed)
- Stallings v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 1994 OK 99, ¶10, 880 P.2d 912(followed)
- Dolese Bros. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 2003 OK 4, ¶¶3-6, 64 P.3d 1093(cited)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…