Siskiyou Pines Developments LLC v. Civil West Engineering Services, Inc.

350 Or. App. 28 (2026) · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 28, 2026 · No. A182097

Summary

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment dismissing Siskiyou Pines Developments LLC's tort claims against the City of Cave Junction, its employees, Civil West Engineering Services, and an employee. The court held that the plaintiff failed to provide timely notice under the Oregon Tort Claims Act and did not establish that the alleged conduct constituted a continuing tort. The court also concluded that Civil West was an agent of the City for notice purposes and that the plaintiff failed to create a factual dispute regarding that status.

Holdings

  1. Siskiyou Pines's March 1, 2022, notice to the City was untimely because it was not given within 180 days after the alleged loss or injury as required by the Oregon Tort Claims Act.
  2. Siskiyou Pines did not sufficiently allege or present a disputed issue of fact that defendants engaged in a continuing tort.
  3. Summary judgment for Civil West was proper because Civil West presented facts supporting its status as a City agent, and Siskiyou Pines failed to produce evidence creating a genuine factual dispute or show that timely notice had been served.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Siskiyou Pines provided timely notice of its claims against the City under the Oregon Tort Claims Act.
  2. Whether the alleged delays constituted a continuing tort that would make the March 1, 2022, notice timely.
  3. Whether summary judgment for Civil West was proper because Civil West presented undisputed facts showing that it was an agent of the City and Siskiyou Pines failed to provide timely notice.
  4. Whether the court could affirm without reaching the alternative summary-judgment grounds concerning statutory duty and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Beneficial Oregon, Inc. v. Bivins, 313 Or. App. 275, 277, 496 P.3d 1104 (2021)(followed)
  • Kutz v. Lee, 291 Or. App. 470, 480, 422 P.3d 362 (2018)(followed)
  • Holdner v. Columbia County, 51 Or. App. 605, 613, 627 P.2d 4 (1981)(followed)
  • Davis v. Bostick, 282 Or. 667, 672-74, 580 P.2d 544 (1978)(followed)
  • Curzi v. Oregon State Lottery, 286 Or. App. 254, 266, 398 P.3d 977, rev. den., 362 Or. 175 (2017)(followed)
  • Ziebert v. Sun Valley Lumber, Inc., 198 Or. App. 162, 170 n. 5, 107 P.3d 668, rev. den., 339 Or. 66 (2005)(followed)
  • Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-Oregon, 289 Or. App. 644, 656, 412 P.3d 202, rev. den., 363 Or. 283 (2018)(followed)
  • Yeager v. Montgomery, 331 Or. App. 263, 266, 546 P.3d 10 (2024)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…