Summary
The Oregon Supreme Court held that an assault upon the victim that merges with the killing cannot serve as the collateral felony supporting a felony-murder instruction. Because the instruction may have discouraged a manslaughter verdict, the court modified the judgment by vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing for manslaughter, with punishment not to exceed the original sentence.
Holdings
- When the only felony apart from the murder is an assault upon the victim that resulted in the victim's death, the assault merges with the killing and cannot be used as the predicate felony for a felony-murder instruction.
- The instruction was prejudicial because it could have influenced the jury against returning a manslaughter verdict, but the error could be remedied by modifying the judgment rather than ordering a new trial.
Questions Presented
- Whether Oregon law permits a felony-murder instruction when the only felony apart from the killing is an assault with a dangerous weapon against the victim that resulted in the victim's death.
- Whether giving the felony-murder instruction was sufficiently prejudicial because it could have inhibited the jury from returning a manslaughter verdict.
- Whether the Oregon Supreme Court could remedy the instructional error by modifying the judgment and remanding for manslaughter resentencing rather than ordering a new trial.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- State v. Essman, 98 Ariz. 228, 235-236, 403 P.2d 540, 545 (1965)(followed)
- State v. Shock, 68 Mo. 552 (1878)(followed)
- People v. Luscomb, 292 N.Y. 390, 55 N.E.2d 469 (1944)(followed)
- People v. Lazar, 271 N.Y. 27, 2 N.E.2d 32 (1936)(followed)
- People v. Moran, 246 N.Y. 100, 102, 158 N.E. 35, 36 (1927)(followed)
- State v. Reyes, 209 Or. 595, 308 P.2d 183 (1957)(distinguished)
- State v. Braley, 224 Or. 1, 355 P.2d 467 (1960)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…