Summary
The Supreme Court of Oregon held that a felon-in-possession conviction under ORS 166.270 remains valid when the predicate felony conviction is later overturned. The statute focuses on the defendant's status as a convicted felon at the time of firearm possession, and later invalidation of the predicate conviction does not retroactively void the firearm conviction. The court affirmed the Court of Appeals and reversed and remanded the circuit court's judgment granting post-conviction relief.
Holdings
- ORS 166.270 requires only that the defendant had been convicted of a felony, as defined by the statute, before possessing the firearm; it does not require that the predicate conviction ultimately remain constitutionally valid.
- A later reversal or setting aside of the predicate felony conviction does not invalidate a felon-in-possession conviction based on firearm possession occurring before the predicate conviction was overturned.
- Article I, section 11, does not require setting aside Bailey's felon-in-possession convictions because the predicate felony was an element of the firearm offenses, not a prior conviction used to enhance punishment at sentencing.
- Due process does not bar a felon-in-possession conviction based on a felony conviction that had not been overturned when the defendant possessed the firearm, even if the predicate conviction was constitutionally infirm and later vacated.
Questions Presented
- Whether ORS 166.270 requires a constitutionally valid predicate felony conviction to support a felon-in-possession conviction.
- Whether a predicate felony conviction later set aside invalidates a felon-in-possession conviction when the defendant possessed the firearm while the predicate conviction remained in effect.
- Whether Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution bars use of the predicate conviction in the felon-in-possession prosecution.
- Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment bars the conviction under these circumstances.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (14)
- Bailey v. Rae, 339 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963)(applied)
- Bailey v. Lampert, 203 Or. App. 45, 125 P.3d 771 (2005)(reviewed)
- State v. Bailey, 144 Or. App. 329, 927 P.2d 157 (1996), rev. den., 324 Or. 654, 931 P.2d 796 (1997)(cited)
- City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or. 725, 688 P.2d 68 (1984)(distinguished)
- State v. Probst, 339 Or. 612, 626-28, 124 P.3d 1237 (2005)(cited)
- Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55, 100 S. Ct. 915, 63 L. Ed. 2d 198 (1980)(followed)
- State v. Welch, 264 Or. 388, 393, 505 P.2d 910 (1973)(cited)
- Stevens v. Bispham, 316 Or. 221, 230, 851 P.2d 556 (1993)(followed)
- State v. Dintelman, 112 Or. App. 350, 353, 829 P.2d 719 (1992)(agreed with)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…